Doctor Gupta
When people are choosing a career, there are many different factors to consider.
What aspects of a job do people value most?
Salary is a possible factor.
These days, with work environments evolving, human interaction might be an important factor.
If you had to choose, is it better to have a job with a high salary but little or no human interaction, or a job with a lower salary that allows for regular interaction with colleagues or customers?
Why?
10/15最新托福考題
Paul
In order for people to be truly satisfied with a job they need validation.
This can only come from frequent and productive interaction with coworkers who acknowledge their hard work and contributions.
l think everyone is looking for a job where they will receive positive feedback from their colleagues and recognition for their achievements.
Kelly
I think that salary is the number one factor in determining whether a certain job is good or not.
In any job interview, the first question for many of us, including myself, really want answered is how much the job pays.
Being a practical person, I would say the purpose of work is to earn money, not to socialize with others.
範文
Although meaningful interaction at work can be rewarding, I believe that salary should be
the primary factor when choosing a career.
As Kelly points out, the main purpose of work is to earn a living, and financial stability is the foundation upon which a comfortable and independent life is built.
Without adequate income, even the most enjoyable job can become a source of anxiety when daily expenses, education, or healthcare cannot be met.
In fact, a well-paying job, even with limited interaction, provides security, access to better opportunities, and the freedom to pursue personal interests outside work.
While Paul’s idea of validation through teamwork is appealing, recognition alone cannot replace the stability that money offers.
A higher salary allows individuals to support their families, invest in their future, and maintain peace of mind.
Ultimately, financial assurance outweighs social connection as the more practical and sustainable career goal.
◆ 開頭策略明確：以 Although 讓步句起首，承認互動的價值，但立即表明主張——薪資應為首要考量，形成對比式破題。
◆ 論點發展連貫：引用 Kelly 的觀點強化理據，指出工作主要目的在於維持生計，並以「生活穩定與獨立」作為幸福的現實基礎。
◆ 理性訴求（logos）強：運用邏輯遞進結構——收入不足→焦慮→影響健康與生活品質，展現清晰因果鏈。
◆ 證據與反駁並行：承認 Paul 的觀點具吸引力，但以「認可無法取代金錢穩定性」駁斥，兼顧公允與說服力。
◆ 結論收束有力：重申「財務保障比社交連結更實際且可持續」，形成首尾呼應。