最新訊息

戴爾美語TOEFL托福試題與解題示範教學 2026年04月15日

202604151452030.jpg
 

戴爾美語TOEFL托福試題與解題示範教學 2026年04月15日

Dr. Gupta:
The fashion industry can have significant environmental impacts, such as pollution and resource depletion. Some people argue that fashion companies should take responsibility for the environmental damage they cause, while others think companies should focus primarily on profits and leave environmental issues to governments and regulations. What is your opinion, and why?

Claire:
I believe fashion companies should be responsible for the environmental damage they cause. Taking responsibility can improve public image, encourage sustainable practices, and contribute to a healthier planet for everyone.

Paul:
I think fashion companies should focus mainly on profit. Environmental issues are important, but governments and regulations should manage them. Companies cannot bear the full responsibility without compromising their business viability.
語料
responsible
1. branding, sustainable, better
2. lower cost; could earn government subsidy if going green; avoid penalties
3. match many customers’ eco-consciousness and win their approval, leading their business to boom
4. the best policy to workers; ensure smooth production and not be poisoned by the process of manufacturing clothing

profit
1. cost down
2. not burden the company with extra expenditure
3. even if make efforts…the difference may be trivial since there are more sources of pollution
4. for start-up fashion businesses, profits should be prioritized
5. fashion businesses change all the time; the standards to be ecological also change a lot; difficult to follow; disorient
6. others are strong

支持企業責任（Claire 的立場）：
企業應對環境損害負責。這不僅能提升品牌形象、贏得環保意識消費者的青睞，還能確保勞工安全，避免生產過程中的毒害。此外，採取永續作為可爭取政府補貼並避免罰款，帶動業務增長。

支持優先獲利（Paul 的立場）：
企業應專注於獲利與生存，特別是新創公司。環境監管應由政府主導，因為企業承擔過多支出會損害競爭力。此外，環保標準變動快速且複雜，容易讓企業迷失方向，且單一公司的改善對全球污染的影響可能微乎其微。
 
完整之範文
While Paul highlights that startups must prioritize profit to survive and suggests that individual corporate efforts may seem trivial compared to global pollution, I agree with Claire.

Fashion companies must take responsibility because aligning with eco-conscious consumers can cause a business to boom, more than offsetting the cost of "going green." Beyond branding, prioritizing sustainability acts as the best policy for workers, ensuring they aren't poisoned during manufacturing. Furthermore, proactive environmentalism helps companies avoid penalties and secure government subsidies. Ultimately, profit and responsibility aren't mutually exclusive; sustainable practices ensure long-term viability rather than disorienting the business.
回上一頁

分校據點